IP Justice Publications
IP Justice Statement Supporting Friends of Development Proposal for a Development Agenda at WIPO
IP JUSTICE STATEMENT on the GROUP of FRIENDS of DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL for a DEVELOPMENT AGENDA at WIPO by IP Justice Executive Director Robin D. Gross at the 1st Session of the Provisional Committee on Proposals Related to a WIPO Development Agenda 23 February 2006 - Geneva, Switzerland Thank you, Mr. Chairman for this opportunity to comment on the Friends of Development proposal. I represent IP Justice, an international civil liberties organization that promotes balanced intellectual property law. Mr. Chairman, IP Justice has coordinated a group statement that has been endorsed by 138 public-interest NGOs from all four corners of the world to express our complete and united support for the Friends of Development proposal. The vast majority of these groups could not be here today to express their concerns, so we carry their message to this forum with this group statement, which is available on the floor table outside in 4 languages. 1. We fully support amending the WIPO Convention to include explicit language incorporating a Development Dimension. As a UN Specialized Agency, WIPO has an obligation to promote the application of intellectual property rights in a manner that promotes economic, social and cultural development in both developed and developing countries. 2. We fully support consideration of a Treaty on Access to Knowledge and Technology. A specification of user freedoms [...]
IP Justice Statement Supporting Chile’s Proposal for a Development Agenda at WIPO
IP JUSTICE STATEMENT on CHILE'S PROPOSAL FOR A DEVELOPMENT AGENDA AT WIPO by IP Justice Executive Director Robin D. Gross at the 1st Session of the Provisional Committee on Proposals Related to a WIPO Development Agenda 21 February 2006 - Geneva, Switzerland Thank you, Mr. Chairman and congratulations on your re-election. I represent IP Justice, an international civil liberties organization that promotes balanced intellectual property law. IP Justice welcomes the thoughtful and constructive proposal put forth by Chile. Chile’s proposal contains three specific and concrete measures that would greatly aid in bringing knowledge and innovation to the developing world. Chile’s first proposal recognizes the significant social value of the public domain, which supports the public policy objectives behind intellectual property laws. As noted by the US delegation in its intervention this morning, copyrights and patents are intended to create a rich public domain that all may access -- by providing a temporary economic incentive to encourage creativity. In addition to ordinary consumers, creators themselves are particularly dependent on access to a robust public domain for education and inspiration. The works of Mozart and Shakespeare are prime examples of public domain works that have enriched humanity for generations, something only possible if a work in the public domain. Chile’s second proposal to examine complementary incentives for creativity, recognizes that exclusive monopoly [...]
WIPO Resumes “Development Agenda” Talks; Developing Countries Continue Push for Balance at WIPO
IP Justice Media Release 20 February 2006 Contact: Robin D. Gross, IP Justice Executive Director Telephone: +1.415.553.6261 Email: robin@ipjustice.org WIPO Resumes "Development Agenda" Talks Developing Countries Continue Push for Balance at WIPO IP Justice is in Geneva this week as the second year of talks resume to debate a “Development Agenda†at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), the UN Specialized Agency that over-sees the formulation of international intellectual property law treaties. In October 2004, the WIPO General Assembly voted to enact a “Development Agendaâ€, intended to reform the agency’s practices that favor large intellectual property owners at the expense of the greater public interest. Led by Brazil and Argentina, a coalition of fourteen developing countries, “the Group of Friends of Developmentâ€, submitted a number of concrete recommendations for reform at WIPO and a re-balancing of IP rights in line with the global public interest. In July 2005, IP Justice published a statement that was signed-on to by 138 public-interest NGO’s from all corners of the globe to support the Friends of Development (FoD) proposal for much needed reform at WIPO. “As a United Nations organization, WIPO must re-focus its work to promote the global public interest,†said IP Justice Executive Director Robin Gross. “Awareness is growing, particularly in developing countries, about the harm to creativity and innovation caused by [...]
Buy the Numbers: Publishers Seek Special Database Monopoly Protections
By Robin Gross - A new open-access online medical journal database teaches African doctors with no research budgets about new medicines and surgical techniques. Scientists are able to study the "greenhouse effect" because weather data is made freely available to the public over the Internet. Electronic databases have proliferated in recent years, creating new information products and services for the public. The availability of information databases fuels innovation by lowering the costs of research and development and spreading knowledge to new sectors. ...
Circumvention Prohibitions Reconsidered: Why America’s Mistake is Europe’s Future
Circumvention Prohibitions Reconsidered: Why America's Mistake is Europe's Future By Robin D. Gross, IP Justice I. US and EU Pressured to Outlaw Consumer Circumvention Today lawmakers all over the world are both dreaming of the opportunities and grappling with the challenges that digital technology creates for authors and distributors of intellectual property. At the same time, consumers express excitement mixed with frustration as eBooks, CDs, DVDs, and other entertainment is increasingly distributed with digital locks restricting their lawful use. For years, the US copyright industry has forcefully pushed a legislative agenda on the international community of laws that outlaw the circumvention of technological restrictions controlling copyrighted works. Confronted with claims by Hollywood that these anti-circumvention measures are necessary to prevent infringement, various national legislatures are now considering laws to prohibit bypassing digital locks on CDs, DVDs, and eBooks, even by the owner of the media who wants to engage in lawful use. Besides preventing a substantial amount of lawful speech, these circumvention measures mark a transition away from the traditional "Sony Betamax" standard under copyright law where toolmakers could only be liable for the illegal activity they intend, to a new standard of strict liability created by the mere possibility of infringement.[1] In 1998 US media giants persuaded the US Congress to pass the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which outlawed [...]
ICANN Threatens Civil Rights of Website Owners: Intellectual Property Interests Govern Use of Personal Information
IP Justice Comments on ICANN WHOIS Preliminary Reports 5 July 2004 view as .doc view as .pdf ICANN Threatens Civil Rights of Website Owners: Intellectual Property Interests Govern Use of Personal Information July 5, 2004 Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Attention: Whois Task Force 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330 Marina del Rey, CA 90292-6601 RE: IP Justice Commentary on ICANN Whois Preliminary Reports Dear Whois Task Force: We appreciate this opportunity to submit commentary regarding the ICANN Whois Task Force preliminary reports on the privacy and other civil liberties implications of the Whois database containing personal information. IP Justice is an international civil liberties organization that promotes balanced intellectual property law in a digital world. We are concerned with protecting freedom of expression and other human rights in the laws that govern the use of technology, particularly the Internet. Information about IP Justice can be found online at www.ipjustice.org. ICANN’s Whois database of personal information (including name, telephone number, home address, and email address) on millions of individuals who register domain names raises a number of significant civil liberties implications. Over-zealous intellectual property holders use the data to threaten and harass people who often have a lawful right to engage in the online activity but lack the resources to defend themselves. Law enforcement agents [...]