Background on Internet Governance

“Internet Governance” discussions often center around ownership or control of the Internet’s DNS root server, or “the root”. But a broader “Internet governance” debate includes an examination of the laws, policies, technologies, and customs that regulate the way in which we use the Internet. Currently, the United States Department of Commerce “controls” the Internet’s root server through its contractual relations with the California non-profit corporation, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN). But many in the international community are displeased with a single country maintaining sole control over the Internet’s DNS root server, since the Internet is a shared global resource. Some developing countries are pushing for Internet governance under the UN’s International Telecommunication Union (ITU), which is multi-national. The US, Europe, and Japan continue to support the Internet management by ICANN. Developing countries are unhappy with ICANN, which is an undemocratic private California corporation that wields enormous power over the governance of the Internet — a part of any nation’s vital infrastructure. ICANN’s legitimacy has been in doubt since its creation, and its tendency to favor large trademark owners at the expense of Internet users’ rights continues to worry Western consumers and developing countries alike. The inordinate level of influence that the United States Government exercises in ICANN policy making is also of concern to the international community. But even with the general dissatisfaction with ICANN, there is little reason to believe that the ITU would be an improvement and would probably be worse when it comes to protecting freedom of expression values. .
. . 

Other Internet Governance Resources:
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Internet Governance Project
ICANN-Watch
United Nations Internet Governance Forum (IGF)
The Public Voice
ICANN Non-Commercial Users Constituency (NCUC)
WSIS Internet Governance Caucus
Internet Democracy Project
Canadian Law Professor Michael Giest Blog
US Attorney Brett Faucett’s Blog on Internet Issues
Brooklyn Law Professor Wendy Seltzer’s Blog
Miami Law Professor Michael Froomkin’s Papers
Karl Auerbach’s CaveBear Blog
Cardozo Law Professor Susan Crawford’s Blog
Internet Governance Project Blog
Stanford Law Professor Larry Lessig’s Blog
UN ICT Task Force Home Page
ICANN-Wiki
“Beyond Internet Governance: The Emerging International Framework for Governing the Networked World”
By Mary C. Rundle
13 December 2005
Sixth Meeting of the ICT Task Force
Meeting Resources and IP Information
March 2004
Markus Kummer Presentation on UN Working Group on Internet Governance (PDF)
May 2004
Internet Governance: The State of Play (PDF)
By Internet Governance Project - September 9, 2004
Making Sense of Internet Governance: Defining Principles and Norms in Policy Context (PDF)
By Internet Governance Project - April 26, 2004
“ITU Workshop: ICANN’s ‘we don’t do governance’ line falls flat”
By Dr. Milton Mueller - Februrary 2004
“WSIS, Internet Governance and the Role of ICANN” (PDF)
By Vinton G. Cerf, Senior Vice President of Technology Strategy for MCI
UN Working Group on Internet Governance (WGIG) Home Page
Consultations on the Establishment of the Working Group on Internet Governance (WGIG)
Geneva, 20-21 September 2004
21 Jul, 2010: IP Justice Comments on ICANN Plans for New Top-Level Domains: Keep the Core Neutral - ICANN Should Avoid Expanding Scope of Mission to Include Enforcing “Morality” and Fighting “Terrorism”
IP Justice submitted brief comments today to ICANN regarding its plan for introducing new Top-Level Domains (TLDs). Specifically, IP Justice raised concerns about policy proposals that threaten freedom of expression on the Internet and seek to expand ICANN's mission to include ensuring "Morality and Public Order" (MAPO) and preventing "terrorism" through personal background checks. IP Justice believes both ...
19 Jun, 2010: Sign the International Civil Society Declaration on the Public Interest Concerns of the Proposed Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA)
Please consider endorsing the International Civil Society Declaration, which was the result of a meeting in Washington, DC (16-18 June 2010) of over 90 academics from 5 continents, public interest organizations and other legal experts concerned with the public interest aspects of ACTA. ACTA is a dangerous proposal to radically expand intellectual property rights at the global level. ...
10 May, 2010: IP Justice Statement to ICANN on Need to Respect Decision of Independent Review Panel on .XXX Domain
IP Justice supports the swift adoption of the decision of the Independent Review Panel (IRP) by ICANN and the inclusion of the applied for .xxx domain name into the root. This IRP decision should not be, and cannot be, a referendum on pornography as some comments urge. This decision is only about ICANN's accountability mechanism - its means ...
3 Oct, 2009: US Agreement With ICANN Leaves Much Undone: The oversight of the Internet’s infrastructure will become more international under a new government agreement with ICANN. But many concerns remain unresolved (Information Week)
The US government appears to be loosening its grip on the governance of the Internet, a move welcomed by many. But critics see the government shirking its obligations to support free expression and free trade. ... ICANN can interfere with freedom of expression by censoring the domain name space and regulating the use of the space indirectly. Experts criticize ...
30 Sep, 2009: ICANN Accountability Post-JPA: No Meaningful Change Expected
While many are dancing in the streets over today's decision by the US Government to loosen some of its ties to ICANN as its a single governmental authority, I'm not convinced this decision will change much on a practical level. The Affirmation of Commitments was signed today by ICANN and the US Government to replace the Joint Project Agreement, ...
22 Sep, 2009: ICANN Staff Up To Same Old “Divide & Conquer” of Civil Society Strategy
I had a conversation recently with a person who had been actively engaged at ICANN in its early days but became disillusioned and disengaged after a few years because his participation lead him to the conclusion that ICANN staff manage the organization's board of directors and the "community" via the GNSO and the At-Large Advisory Committee. He said the ...
3 Sep, 2009: Public Interest Groups in ICANN Appeal to New President For Fairer Treatment For Civil Society
The organization that represents Non-Commercial Internet Users in the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) issued an open letter to the Board this week, expressing concern about the possible failure of ICANN's attempt to balance the representation of commercial and noncommercial interests.
21 Aug, 2009: “Top Ten Myths About Civil Society Participation in ICANN” From the Non-Commercial Users Constituency (NCUC)
ICANN Staff and the commercial constituencies at ICANN have been busy spreading mis-information about civil society participation at ICANN - largely to keep civil society and noncommercial interests marginalized. For example, ICANN is not allowing the noncommercial users to elect their representatives on the GNSO Policy Council and will instead "appoint" representatives, unlike all the other constituencies at ICANN. ...
18 Aug, 2009: Letter from Non-Commercial Users to ICANN Board of Directors and CEO on Stakeholder Group Charter Issue
This letter comes from nearly 150 individual and organizational members of ICANN’s Non-Commercial Users Constituency (NCUC). It is also endorsed by public interest groups outside of NCUC. We are all deeply concerned about the July 30, 2009 ICANN Board decisions regarding the restructuring of the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO). We believe that the Noncommercial Stakeholder Group ...
26 Jul, 2009: Will ICANN Listen to Civil Society and Respect Noncommercial Users?
Public comments on stakeholder group charters are in - again. Comments submitted to ICANN were overwhelmingly in favor of reinstating the consensus charter submitted by noncommercial users. The Internet Governance Project asks "Is ICANN Listening?" to civil society yet.
- View all entries under Internet Governance