EUCD Update     

YOU CAN MAKE A
DIFFERENCE!

IP Justice
   About IP Justice
   Principles of IPJ
   Publications
   Media Releases
   IPJ in the Media
   Join / Donate
 
Campaigns
   CODE
   FTAA
   WIPO
   WSIS
 
Resources
   By Region
   IP Hot Spots
   World IP News
   Reading Rooms
   Treaties &
      Agreements
   Book Store
 
 
Enter your email
to receive the
IP Justice Newsletter.


Privacy Policy

Creative Commons License

IP Justice is a member of the Global Internet Liberty Campaign (GILC).

A French law project harder than DMCA ?
By Loic Dachary

The details of the upcoming french law to implement the EUCD (the European equivalent of the DMCA) were leaked to the public[1] by AEL, a Belgium non-for-profit organisation.

France, the original country of "droit d'auteur" is taking a path that leads it very far away from the original spirit advocated by Victor Hugo two centuries ago. Although the EUCD is considered harmful to the rights of the public, it is generally considered less dangerous than the DMCA. For instance, the EUCD does not say that it is forbidden to talk about circumvention of technical measures. However, the French Ministry of culture proposed an implementation of the EUCD for France that carries that restriction (free translation):

"Article 12: Is considered a counterfeit:

  1. The fact that a person purposedly (or with reasonable ground to think she will) circumvents any technical measure protecting a work [...]
  1. The act of manufacturing, importing, selling, lending, renting, providing any technology, product, device, apparel or component, or providing any service, information, mean designed for the purpose or having the consequence to facilitate or enable the implementation, in all or in part, of one of the facts described in 1).
  1. The act of ordering, designing, organizing, reproducing, distributing, publicizing, bring to the attention of a third party, directly or indirectly any technology, product, device, apparel, component, service or mean in order to enable the implementation in all or in part of the actions described in 1) and 2). "

The scary part can be summarized shortly as "The act of providing information having the consequence to partly facilitate or enable the circumvention of a technical measure is a counterfeit". The scope is so broad that it can virtually include anything more or less related to a technical measure, as long as it can be applied on a copyrighted work.

It is generally understood that researchers should not be bound by such restrictions. It would basically cripple all research related to cryptography or security. However, the French Ministry of Culture does not grant such an exception to schools and research centres. > From the long debate that addressed this issue back in December 2002[2], one can conclude that it did so to satisfy the pressing requests of the French representatives of the media industry.

It looks like France is on the verge of having the most crippled "droit d'auteur" in Europe, disastrously ending centuries of good reputation.

References:

  [1] 4 April 2003, law project
   http://www.ael.be/action/2003/eucd/france/

  [2] 5 December 2002, CSPLA debate
   http://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/cspla/cr051202.pdf

Read the Principles of IP Justice and Sign-on!
1. We reserve the right to control our individual experience of intellectual property.
2. Creators deserve to be compensated.
3. We reserve our right to make private copies of lawfully acquired intellectual property.
4. Technology and information that enable the exercise of rights should be lawful.
5. "Copy Rights" come with "Copy Responsibilities."

Sign-on to the Principles!
Enter your email to sign-on to the IP Justice Principles!

Privacy Policy

DESIGN BY WESTBASE
copyright © 2003 IP Justice
 Web hosting by Ctyme